{"id":670,"date":"2018-09-19T13:32:00","date_gmt":"2018-09-19T23:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/?p=670"},"modified":"2022-06-05T13:33:00","modified_gmt":"2022-06-05T23:33:00","slug":"nlrb-proposed-rule-would-tighten-joint-employer-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/news-and-information\/nlrb-proposed-rule-would-tighten-joint-employer-test\/","title":{"rendered":"NLRB Proposed Rule Would Tighten Joint Employer Test"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>On September 14, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/09\/14\/2018-19930\/the-standard-for-determining-joint-employer-status\" target=\"_blank\">notice<\/a>\u00a0of proposed rulemaking on \u201cThe Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status\u201d that would roll back the Browning-Ferris joint employer test. Under the proposed rule, an employer may be found to be a joint-employer of another employer\u2019s employees only if it possesses and exercises substantial, direct and immediate control over the essential terms and conditions of employment and has done so in a manner that is not limited and routine. Comments on this proposed rule must be submitted on or before November 13, 2018.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On September 14, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published a\u00a0notice\u00a0of proposed rulemaking on \u201cThe Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status\u201d that would roll back the Browning-Ferris joint employer test. Under the proposed rule, an employer may be found to be a joint-employer of another employer\u2019s employees only if it possesses and exercises substantial, direct [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=670"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":671,"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions\/671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.skyloft.dev\/hosted-clients\/esandalaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}